|
The statue of ''Laocoön and His Sons'' ((イタリア語:Gruppo del Laocoonte)), also called the ''Laocoön Group'', has been one of the most famous ancient sculptures ever since it was excavated in Rome in 1506 and placed on public display in the Vatican,〔Beard, 209〕 where it remains. Exceptionally, it is very likely to be the same object as a statue praised in the highest terms by the main Roman writer on art, Pliny the Elder.〔The Capitoline Wolf was until recently thought to be the same statue praised by Pliny, but recent tests suggest it is medieval.〕 The figures are near life-size and the group is a little over in height, showing the Trojan priest Laocoön and his sons Antiphantes and Thymbraeus being attacked by sea serpents.〔 The group has been "the prototypical icon of human agony" in Western art,〔Spivey, 25〕 and unlike the agony often depicted in Christian art showing the Passion of Jesus and martyrs, this suffering has no redemptive power or reward.〔Spivey, 28–29〕 The suffering is shown through the contorted expressions of the faces (Charles Darwin pointed out that Laocoön's bulging eyebrows are physiologically impossible), which are matched by the struggling bodies, especially that of Laocoön himself, with every part of his body straining.〔Spivey, 25 (Darwin), 121–122〕 Pliny attributes the work, then in the palace of Emperor Titus, to three Greek sculptors from the island of Rhodes: Agesander, Athenodoros and Polydorus, but does not give a date or patron. In style it is considered "one of the finest examples of the Hellenistic baroque" and certainly in the Greek tradition,〔Boardman, 199〕 but it is not known whether it is an original work or a copy of an earlier sculpture, probably in bronze, or made for a Greek or Roman commission. The view that it is an original work of the 2nd century BC now has few if any supporters, although many still see it as a copy of such a work made in the early Imperial period, probably of a bronze original.〔Clark, 219–221 was an early proponent of this view; see also Barkan, caption opp. p 1, Janson etc〕 Others see it as probably an original work of the later period, continuing to use the Pergamese style of some two centuries earlier. In either case, it was probably commissioned for the home of a wealthy Roman, possibly of the Imperial family. Various dates have been suggested for the statue, ranging from about 200 BC to the 70s AD,〔Boardman, 199 says "about 200 BC"; Spivey, 26, 36, feels it may have been commissioned by Titus.〕 though "a Julio-Claudian date (27 BC and 68 AD ) ... is now preferred".〔Howard, 422〕 Although mostly in excellent condition for an excavated sculpture, the group is missing several parts, and analysis suggests that it was remodelled in ancient times and has undergone a number of restorations since it was excavated.〔Howard, throughout; "Chronology", and several discussions in the other sources〕 It is on display in the Museo Pio-Clementino, a part of the Vatican Museums. ==Subject== The story of Laocoön, a Trojan priest, came from the Greek Epic Cycle on the Trojan Wars, though it is not mentioned by Homer. It had been the subject of a tragedy, now lost, by Sophocles and was mentioned by other Greek writers, though the events around the attack by the serpents vary considerably. The most famous account of these is now in Virgil's ''Aeneid'' (see the ''Aeneid'' quotation at the entry Laocoön), but this dates from between 29 and 19 BC, which is possibly later than the sculpture. However, some scholars see the group as a depiction of the scene as described by Virgil.〔Boardman, 199, also ''Sperlonga und Vergil'' by Roland Hampe; but see Smith, 109 for the opposite view.〕 In Virgil Laocoön was a priest of Poseidon who was killed with both his sons after attempting to expose the ruse of the Trojan Horse by striking it with a spear. In Sophocles, on the other hand, he was a priest of Apollo, who should have been celibate but had married. The serpents killed only the two sons, leaving Laocoön himself alive to suffer.〔Smith, 109〕 In other versions he was killed for having had sex with his wife in the temple of Poseidon, or simply making a sacrifice in the temple with his wife present.〔Stewart, 85, this last in the commentary on Virgil of Maurus Servius Honoratus, citing Euphorion of Chalcis〕 In this second group of versions, the snakes were sent by Poseidon〔William Smith, ''Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology'', Taylor and Walton, 1846, p. 776〕 and in the first by Poseidon and Athena, or Apollo, and the deaths were interpreted by the Trojans as proof that the horse was a sacred object. The two versions have rather different morals: Laocoön was either punished for doing wrong, or for being right.〔 The snakes are depicted as both biting and constricting, and are probably intended as venomous, as in Virgil.〔The Greeks were familiar with constricting snakes, and the small boa ''Eryx jaculus'' is still native to Greece. But the danger to Ancient Greeks from venomous snakes was far greater〕 Pietro Aretino thought so, praising the group in 1537: ...the two serpents, in attacking the three figures, produce the most striking semblances of fear, suffering and death. The youth embraced in the coils is fearful; the old man struck by the fangs is in torment; the child who has received the poison, dies.〔Farinella, 16〕 In at least one Greek telling of the story the oldest son is able to escape, and the composition seems to allow for that possibility.〔Stewart, 78〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Laocoön and His Sons」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|